Suez map

Container shipping braces for volatility as Red Sea routes beckon

For over a year attacks on merchant vessels by Houthi militants has forced container carriers to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. However, a newly established ceasefire and assurances from Houthi forces to limit attacks on non-Israeli vessels signal the possibility of a return to the Suez Canal route.

The ceasefire in Gaza and Houthi pledges to cease attacks on most vessels offer cautious optimism for carriers, who have stated that they will only return to Red Sea transits “when it is safe to do so”.

The assurance that ships will not be targeted, alongside a reduction in hostility towards vessels calling at Israeli ports, should pave the way for safer Red Sea transits.

However, the situation remains fragile. The Houthis have reserved the right to resume attacks should aggression occur in Yemen, and their targeting of Israeli-flagged or wholly Israeli-owned vessels persists. Furthermore, full implementation of the ceasefire agreement’s later stages is crucial for long-term stability.

Capacity oversupply threatens
While the reopening of the Red Sea route presents an opportunity to streamline shipping operations, it also introduces significant challenges.

Currently, close to 100% of container vessels avoid the Suez Canal, diverting around Africa and effectively removing over 12% of fleet capacity. This artificial tightening of capacity has driven freight rates to significantly higher levels in 2024, with spot rates more than tripling on some trades.

The return to shorter voyages through the Suez Canal will flood the market with capacity, dramatically altering the supply-demand balance. Analysts predict carriers will struggle to absorb the 1.8m TEU excess, with scrapping and slow steaming unlikely to offset the impact.

Operational challenges
Resuming Red Sea transits will also bring logistical hurdles. Carriers face the complex task of realigning schedules disrupted by the year-long diversions. Ships arriving earlier or later than expected at ports could lead to congestion and delays, adding to the strain on global supply chains.

Port congestion, particularly in Europe, is a key concern. A surge in vessel arrivals could overwhelm infrastructure, causing temporary backlogs that disrupt the smooth flow of goods. The shipping industry must also contend with record deliveries of new vessels, further compounding capacity issues.

While the reopening of the Red Sea route offers opportunities to reduce transit times and operational costs, the transition is unlikely to be smooth. The combination of excess capacity, volatile freight rates, and logistical challenges will create uncertainty in the short term.

With geopolitical risks casting uncertainty over the industry, building resilient supply chains, securing comprehensive cargo insurance, and managing budgets effectively will be essential for navigating the 2025 sea freight landscape.

In this volatile market, our marine insurance cover and fixed-rate agreements on key shipping routes help minimise risk and provide budgetary stability.

To discover how Metro’s insurance solutions and fixed-rate options can support your business in 2025, please EMAIL Managing Director Andy Smith.

Cathay tailfins 1440x1080 1

Asia–Europe airfreight: Growth and vulnerabilities

Despite growth and robust demand airfreight faces significant challenges, including reliance on eCommerce, capacity pressures, and geopolitical disruptions.

Airfreight demand on the Asia–Europe route saw a strong performance in 2024, bolstered by eCommerce, automotive parts, pharmaceuticals, garments and high-value electronics. Despite a slowdown in Europe’s domestic electric vehicle (EV) market, manufacturers have maintained steady shipments of EV-related spare parts to ensure regional stock levels. Meanwhile, high-value and time-sensitive automotive components remain key drivers of growth.

Pharmaceuticals and perishable goods have seen consistent demand on routes from Europe to Asia, with semi-conductor equipment and machinery playing a significant role. Electronics, one of the region’s most valuable cargo types, continues to move in high volumes, reflecting growing technological and consumer demands across Europe and Asia.

eCommerce slowdown exposes dependency

Despite surging demand for general cargo like electronics, automobile parts and garments out of India, Vietnam and Thailand, the airfreight sector’s strong reliance on eCommerce has been a double-edged sword. While the pandemic initially spurred a boom in eCommerce shipments, recent months have seen a sharp decline, with eCommerce volumes dropping significantly since the start of the year,, particularly from China.

Retailers’ full inventories and softer consumer demand have exacerbated this trend, leaving carriers grappling with reduced activity levels. While other verticals, such as pharmaceuticals and automotive, remain stable, the gap left by diminishing eCommerce volumes presents an ongoing challenge.

Capacity challenges and geopolitical pressures

Capacity remains a key issue on the Asia–Europe route. Airlines have deployed additional resources, including charter flights, to manage peak-season bottlenecks. However, this has come at a premium, with carriers competing for limited space amid strong demand for specific commodities.

Geopolitical factors have further complicated operations. The closure of Russian airspace forced carriers to reroute flights, leading to longer journey times, higher fuel consumption, and increased costs. European carriers also face competition from new Chinese entrants and Middle Eastern airlines have added another layer of complexity. This competition, while offering more options, has compressed margins for traditional carriers.

Balancing resilience with adaptation

Looking ahead, the Asia–Europe airfreight trade lane must strike a balance between resilience and adaptation. While commodities such as automotive parts, pharmaceuticals, garments and high-tech goods provide a stable foundation, diversification across more verticals will reduce vulnerabilities.

Capacity pressures and geopolitical disruptions will require innovative solutions, from optimising routes to strengthening partnerships with supply chain stakeholders.

Metro is here to help you navigate these complexities with tailored solutions that ensure reliability, cost-efficiency, and resilience.

Our airfreight, charter, and sea/air services are designed to handle urgent and sensitive shipments with precision. By leveraging block space agreements (BSA) and capacity purchase agreements (CPA), we lock-in space and competitive rates on the busiest trade lanes.

Whatever you’re shipping, Metro’s expertise and strategic carrier partnerships can optimise your supply chain while saving you money.

EMAIL Elliot Carlile, Operations Director, today to explore how Metro’s solutions can support your business on the Asia–Europe trade lane and beyond.

container ship and naval escort

Shipping routes likely to remain diverted until August

The diversion of container shipping around the Cape of Good Hope is expected to continue well into 2025 as carriers prioritise stability over the potential risks of returning to the Red Sea, despite recent advancements in the Suez Canal’s infrastructure

The reluctance to return to the Red Sea stems from attacks on commercial shipping by Iran-backed Houthi forces, which have created a precarious operating environment. Earlier incidents prompted carriers to divert ships around the Cape of Good Hope, and the industry remains cautious about resuming transits until the risks are fully mitigated.

Efforts by carriers like CMA CGM to reintroduce Suez services under naval protection have met resistance from shippers who fear both financial and operational uncertainties. As a result, even if the Red Sea crisis were resolved, it is likely that diversions around the Cape of Good Hope would persist for several months while confidence is rebuilt.

The logistical complexity of reconfiguring networks, combined with the risk of potential attacks, has led carriers to maintain their Cape of Good Hope detours and with the lines set to phase in new networks over February and March, further adjustments to accommodate Suez transits are unlikely before August at the earliest.

Shippers, too, are hesitant to support a return to the Red Sea. The concern is not just the extended transit times around Africa but the financial risks associated with general average (GA). If a ship were to be attacked and damaged, resulting in environmental cleanup or other liabilities, insurers may not cover GA in such high-risk zones.

Egypt has successfully tested a new 10 km extension of the Suez Canal, which allows for two-way traffic and increases the canal’s daily capacity by an additional 6 to 8 ships. This improvement also reduces the likelihood of severe disruptions, such as the grounding of the “Ever Given” in the single-lane section of the canal.

As conditions stabilise, the Suez will likely regain its position as the preferred route, but for now the added capacity is not required.

With geopolitical risks casting uncertainty over the industry, building resilient supply chains, securing comprehensive cargo insurance, and managing budgets effectively will be essential for shippers navigating the complexities of the 2025 sea freight landscape.

In this volatile market, our marine insurance cover and fixed-rate agreements on key shipping routes help minimise risk and provide budgetary stability.

To discover how Metro’s insurance solutions and fixed-rate options can support your business in 2025, please EMAIL Managing Director Andy Smith.

computer down 1440x1080 1

Freight market outlook 2025: Navigating uncertainty and change

The freight industry faces a challenging 2025, with ongoing diversions around Africa, potential labour strikes, and looming tariff changes shaping the air and sea freight landscape. 

While best and worst-case scenarios could unfold, the most likely outcome lies somewhere in between, creating a complex and dynamic environment for shippers and carriers alike.

Red sea disruptions and capacity adjustments

Persistent attacks in the Red Sea continue to divert container traffic via the Cape of Good Hope, extending transit times and keeping freight rates elevated. Even if hostilities end, a lengthy adjustment period is likely as shipping lines reintroduce Red Sea routes.

With carriers set to phase in new networks in February and March, further changes to accommodate Suez transits may not occur before August. This transitional phase could temporarily worsen congestion and delays. However, once stabilised, the market would benefit from restored transit times and reduced rates.

The reintroduction of capacity also raises concerns about overcapacity. Carriers are actively working to mitigate this risk through measures like scrapping older vessels, reducing charter fleets, slow steaming, and blank sailings. While these steps may stabilise rates, their effectiveness will depend on demand levels throughout the year.

Labour strikes and tariff impacts

Despite agreement on outstanding issues on the 8th January, the threat of strikes at US East and Gulf coast ports has not entirely lifted. And while they are theoretically unlikely, they could remain a possibility until Summer 2025.

Tariffs, on the other hand, remain a critical factor. New US tariffs in 2025, particularly on Chinese imports and goods from Canada and Mexico, could drastically reshape trade flows. Anticipation of these tariffs has already led to front-loading, as shippers move goods early to avoid higher costs. This behaviour may disrupt seasonality, creating spikes in demand and rates before tariffs take effect, followed by lower volumes afterwards. Additionally, tariffs could encourage sourcing shifts to countries like Vietnam and India, further altering global trade dynamics.

Air freight under pressure

Air freight, driven by strong eCommerce demand from Asia, enjoyed robust growth in 2024, but 2025 presents significant headwinds. Potential changes to the US ‘de minimis’ thresholds could curb eCommerce shipments, while Trump’s proposed tariffs may disrupt transpacific flows further.

Capacity constraints, already a challenge, could ease slightly if eCommerce demand slows. This would benefit transatlantic shippers, who saw air cargo spot rates from Western Europe to the US double during the 2024 peak season. However, other pressures loom, including the EU’s ReFuelEU Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) mandate, which took effect on 1st January 2025, requiring a minimum of 2% SAF at EU airports—raising airline costs.

A year of uncertainty

2025 will be a year of adjustment for the freight industry as carriers and shippers navigate geopolitical risks, evolving capacity challenges, and shifting trade policies.

In addition weather related issues as a result of global warming and other environmental impact need to be considered during certain months and seasons. Hurricanes, typhoons, flooding, fires, volcanic occurrences could all have an impact in certain regions at different times.

Shippers must prepare for fluctuating demand and rates, anticipate potential disruptions, and stay informed. Flexibility and proactive planning will be key to navigating the complexities of 2025 and ensuring long-term success.

For urgent and sensitive shipments, Metro offers tailored airfreight, charter, and sea/air solutions. With block space agreements (BSA) and capacity purchase agreements (CPA), to guarantee space and competitive rates on the busiest routes.

In a volatile sea freight market, our fixed-rate agreements on popular shipping routes reduce risk and provide essential budgetary certainty. 

To explore how Metro’s carrier agreements could optimise your supply chains and save you money in 2025, please EMAIL our Managing Director Andy Smith.