Trump tariffs on mobile 1440x1080 1

The risks of President Trump’s trade policies

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

President Donald Trump’s inauguration speech and subsequent executive orders have provided further insights into his proposed trade policies. 

His emphasis on protectionism, territorial expansion, and the establishment of an “External Revenue Service” marks a significant shift in the approach to international trade, raising concerns among stakeholders in global supply chains.

While intended to prioritise domestic economic growth, these policies could have far-reaching consequences for international trade, supply chains, and geopolitical stability.

In his inauguration speech, President Trump stated a commitment to reversing what he views as exploitative trade practices. Key elements of his vision include:

Tariffs and Revenue Generation: Trump announced the establishment of an “External Revenue Service” to manage tariffs, duties, and revenues, asserting that this would generate “massive amounts of money pouring into our treasury coming from foreign sources.” He also hinted at potential tariffs of 25% on imports from Mexico and Canada, with implementation possibly starting as early as February.

Territorial Expansion and Strategic Assets: In a surprising claim, Trump indicated intentions to “take back” the Panama Canal, erroneously stating that China operates it. He further noted ambitions to expand US territory, with implications for regions like Panama, Greenland, and Canada. These statements have added to geopolitical uncertainties.

Inflation Concerns: Despite his stated goal of reducing inflation, Trump’s emphasis on tariffs directly contradicts this aim. As economic experts have pointed out, tariffs tend to increase costs for businesses and consumers, creating inflationary pressures.

Implications for Global Trade and Supply Chains

Tariffs and Retaliation
The proposed tariffs, including the suggested 25% levies on Mexico and Canada, pose a risk of retaliation from trading partners. Such measures could disrupt the smooth flow of goods, increase trade barriers, and lead to a cycle of reciprocal tariffs. Industries like automotive, manufacturing, and electronics, which rely heavily on global supply chains, would be particularly affected.

These policies also threaten to undermine trade relationships between the US and its partners, creating uncertainty for businesses dependent on predictable supply chain operations.

Inflationary Impact
Trump’s claim that tariffs would enrich the US by taxing foreign countries misrepresents how tariffs function. In reality, these costs are borne by importers and ultimately passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. This would likely lead to inflation, contradicting the administration’s stated goal of reducing costs and combating record inflation.

Geopolitical Tensions
Trump’s assertion regarding the Panama Canal and broader territorial ambitions increases geopolitical uncertainties. Control of key trade corridors like the Panama Canal is crucial for global shipping routes, and such rhetoric risks destabilising international relations. The suggestion of US territorial expansion further complicates trade dynamics, with potential repercussions for trade routes and global commerce.

Impacts on the UK and Europe
For the UK, the indirect effects of Trump’s policies are concerning. Europe, a key trading partner for the UK, may face economic disruptions due to strained US-EU trade relations. The UK’s automotive, machinery, and chemicals sectors, which rely on seamless integration with European supply chains, could experience higher costs, delays, and reduced demand.

Additionally, retaliatory measures by China and other US trading partners may flood global markets with cheaper goods, increasing competition for European industries and indirectly affecting UK exporters.

At Metro, we leverage award-winning services and deep market expertise to help businesses navigate the challenges posed by new tariffs, rising trade barriers, and supply chain disruptions. Whether it’s mitigating the impact of rising trade barriers, reconfiguring supply chains to address changing energy policies, or responding to broader global and UK economic developments, Metro provides tailored insights and solutions to ensure your success.

In times of uncertainty, preparation is key. With Metro as your trusted partner, you can adapt and thrive in this evolving landscape.

Contact Managing Director Andy Smith today to explore how we can safeguard your supply chain and help you navigate the complexities of 2025.

Suez map

Container shipping braces for volatility as Red Sea routes beckon

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

For over a year attacks on merchant vessels by Houthi militants has forced container carriers to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. However, a newly established ceasefire and assurances from Houthi forces to limit attacks on non-Israeli vessels signal the possibility of a return to the Suez Canal route.

The ceasefire in Gaza and Houthi pledges to cease attacks on most vessels offer cautious optimism for carriers, who have stated that they will only return to Red Sea transits “when it is safe to do so”.

The assurance that ships will not be targeted, alongside a reduction in hostility towards vessels calling at Israeli ports, should pave the way for safer Red Sea transits.

However, the situation remains fragile. The Houthis have reserved the right to resume attacks should aggression occur in Yemen, and their targeting of Israeli-flagged or wholly Israeli-owned vessels persists. Furthermore, full implementation of the ceasefire agreement’s later stages is crucial for long-term stability.

Capacity oversupply threatens
While the reopening of the Red Sea route presents an opportunity to streamline shipping operations, it also introduces significant challenges.

Currently, close to 100% of container vessels avoid the Suez Canal, diverting around Africa and effectively removing over 12% of fleet capacity. This artificial tightening of capacity has driven freight rates to significantly higher levels in 2024, with spot rates more than tripling on some trades.

The return to shorter voyages through the Suez Canal will flood the market with capacity, dramatically altering the supply-demand balance. Analysts predict carriers will struggle to absorb the 1.8m TEU excess, with scrapping and slow steaming unlikely to offset the impact.

Operational challenges
Resuming Red Sea transits will also bring logistical hurdles. Carriers face the complex task of realigning schedules disrupted by the year-long diversions. Ships arriving earlier or later than expected at ports could lead to congestion and delays, adding to the strain on global supply chains.

Port congestion, particularly in Europe, is a key concern. A surge in vessel arrivals could overwhelm infrastructure, causing temporary backlogs that disrupt the smooth flow of goods. The shipping industry must also contend with record deliveries of new vessels, further compounding capacity issues.

While the reopening of the Red Sea route offers opportunities to reduce transit times and operational costs, the transition is unlikely to be smooth. The combination of excess capacity, volatile freight rates, and logistical challenges will create uncertainty in the short term.

With geopolitical risks casting uncertainty over the industry, building resilient supply chains, securing comprehensive cargo insurance, and managing budgets effectively will be essential for navigating the 2025 sea freight landscape.

In this volatile market, our marine insurance cover and fixed-rate agreements on key shipping routes help minimise risk and provide budgetary stability.

To discover how Metro’s insurance solutions and fixed-rate options can support your business in 2025, please EMAIL Managing Director Andy Smith.

Cathay tailfins 1440x1080 1

Asia–Europe airfreight: Growth and vulnerabilities

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , ,

Despite growth and robust demand airfreight faces significant challenges, including reliance on eCommerce, capacity pressures, and geopolitical disruptions.

Airfreight demand on the Asia–Europe route saw a strong performance in 2024, bolstered by eCommerce, automotive parts, pharmaceuticals, garments and high-value electronics. Despite a slowdown in Europe’s domestic electric vehicle (EV) market, manufacturers have maintained steady shipments of EV-related spare parts to ensure regional stock levels. Meanwhile, high-value and time-sensitive automotive components remain key drivers of growth.

Pharmaceuticals and perishable goods have seen consistent demand on routes from Europe to Asia, with semi-conductor equipment and machinery playing a significant role. Electronics, one of the region’s most valuable cargo types, continues to move in high volumes, reflecting growing technological and consumer demands across Europe and Asia.

eCommerce slowdown exposes dependency

Despite surging demand for general cargo like electronics, automobile parts and garments out of India, Vietnam and Thailand, the airfreight sector’s strong reliance on eCommerce has been a double-edged sword. While the pandemic initially spurred a boom in eCommerce shipments, recent months have seen a sharp decline, with eCommerce volumes dropping significantly since the start of the year,, particularly from China.

Retailers’ full inventories and softer consumer demand have exacerbated this trend, leaving carriers grappling with reduced activity levels. While other verticals, such as pharmaceuticals and automotive, remain stable, the gap left by diminishing eCommerce volumes presents an ongoing challenge.

Capacity challenges and geopolitical pressures

Capacity remains a key issue on the Asia–Europe route. Airlines have deployed additional resources, including charter flights, to manage peak-season bottlenecks. However, this has come at a premium, with carriers competing for limited space amid strong demand for specific commodities.

Geopolitical factors have further complicated operations. The closure of Russian airspace forced carriers to reroute flights, leading to longer journey times, higher fuel consumption, and increased costs. European carriers also face competition from new Chinese entrants and Middle Eastern airlines have added another layer of complexity. This competition, while offering more options, has compressed margins for traditional carriers.

Balancing resilience with adaptation

Looking ahead, the Asia–Europe airfreight trade lane must strike a balance between resilience and adaptation. While commodities such as automotive parts, pharmaceuticals, garments and high-tech goods provide a stable foundation, diversification across more verticals will reduce vulnerabilities.

Capacity pressures and geopolitical disruptions will require innovative solutions, from optimising routes to strengthening partnerships with supply chain stakeholders.

Metro is here to help you navigate these complexities with tailored solutions that ensure reliability, cost-efficiency, and resilience.

Our airfreight, charter, and sea/air services are designed to handle urgent and sensitive shipments with precision. By leveraging block space agreements (BSA) and capacity purchase agreements (CPA), we lock-in space and competitive rates on the busiest trade lanes.

Whatever you’re shipping, Metro’s expertise and strategic carrier partnerships can optimise your supply chain while saving you money.

EMAIL Elliot Carlile, Operations Director, today to explore how Metro’s solutions can support your business on the Asia–Europe trade lane and beyond.

New York port 1440x1080 1

USEC sea freight rates climb despite ILA strike resolution

Jan 23, 2025 | , , , , , , , , ,

The recent resolution of labour negotiations between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the US Maritime Alliance has averted a potentially disruptive strike across US East Coast and Gulf Coast ports. However, the last-minute nature of the agreement has left shippers contending with elevated costs, strained supply chains, and lingering uncertainties.

In anticipation of a strike, shippers front-loaded cargo to avoid potential port closures, causing a short-term surge in import volumes. Retailers moved spring merchandise earlier than usual, and many shifted inbound flows to US West Coast ports or secondary supply sources. While these actions ensured inventory availability, they also lengthened transit times, strained port operations, and drove up transportation costs.

Even with the strike threat resolved, the backlog of elevated volumes will take time to normalise. Some ports are already reporting delays as they work through the excess cargo, further tightening capacity and extending delivery schedules. This logistical ripple effect is compounded by pre-Lunar New Year demand, which has spurred additional shipments and intensified pressure on the supply chain.

Rising costs and capacity constraints
The surge in front-loaded cargo has led to significant rate increases on the transpacific trade lane. Spot rates to the US East Coast rose sharply, with increases exceeding 25% since mid-December. This upward trend, driven by demand spikes and tighter capacity, is expected to persist as carriers announce new general rate increases (GRIs) of up to $3,000 per 40ft container in February.

Moreover, these measures are creating downstream financial impacts for businesses. Elevated inventory levels, longer transit times, and higher transportation costs are affecting margins and working capital, particularly for goods sourced from Asia. Export sectors, including refrigerated and hazardous freight, are also facing acute challenges due to capacity constraints and mitigation actions by carriers.

The overall capacity situation on the Asia–USWC lane tells a more complex story. Carriers have deployed 1.34 million TEU for the four-week CNY period, representing a sharp 33% year-on-year increase and the highest capacity level in recent years and far outpaces current demand increases, creating a risk of oversupply.

Currently, only 9% of capacity has been blanked for the CNY period, well below the 23% blanked in 2024 and the pre-pandemic average of 19%. Historically, carriers have announced significant additional blank sailings closer to CNY and this pattern may repeat in 2025, although uncertainties around the phase-in of new alliance networks may complicate the picture

Strike resolution provides relief, but challenges persist
While the strike resolution has provided relief, ongoing geopolitical and seasonal pressures continue to shape market dynamics. The Lunar New Year holiday, which falls on 29 January, has spurred a wave of early shipments, exacerbating capacity challenges on the transpacific trade lane. Simultaneously, uncertainty surrounding the incoming US administration’s potential tariff increases has added urgency to shipments, further intensifying demand.

Geopolitical risks, such as tensions in the Red Sea and concerns about a renewed US-China trade war, remain a wildcard that could destabilise global trade flows. These factors, combined with already elevated freight rates and tight capacity, are likely to keep shippers on edge in the coming months.

The resolution of the ILA strike may have averted immediate disruption, but the ripple effects of front-loaded cargo, capacity challenges, and elevated freight rates will continue to impact supply chains in the months ahead. Metro is here to help you manage these complexities, offering real-time insights and effective strategies to keep your goods moving efficiently and cost-effectively.

EMAIL Managing Director Andrew Smith today to discover how Metro can protect and future-proof your supply chain in North America and beyond. Let us help you build a resilient strategy for 2025 and navigate the challenges ahead with confidence.

Category: Supply Chain

Air | Retail | Sea | Supply Chain

Latest News in this category