Blanking is biting

Blanked Sailings Amid Geopolitical Shifts

May 13, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Global sea freight is navigating a complex landscape marked by geopolitical tensions, fluctuating demand, and strategic capacity adjustments and while a temporary US-China tariff truce offers a glimmer of hope, challenges persist across major trade lanes.

In response to weakening demand, particularly on transpacific routes, ocean carriers have taken aggressive steps to manage overcapacity. Year-on-year capacity reductions of around 4% to 5% have been recorded on Asia-North America trades for April and May. The Asia to US East Coast route has been especially impacted, with reports suggesting shippers face as much as a 40% cut in weekly slot availability due to a sharp rise in blanked sailings. Some weeks have seen up to 10 scheduled services withdrawn.

The trend of blank sailings is not uniform across all alliances. Major players have taken divergent approaches, with some choosing to maintain network stability while others have opted for deep cuts to protect rate levels. MSC, the world’s largest shipping line, has launched a sweeping revamp of its east-west network, consolidating services and shifting vessels between routes in an effort to optimise capacity and mitigate the financial impacts of underutilised sailings.

The effect of these service cancellations has been most visible in spot rate volatility. Container spot rates between Asia and Europe have been pressured as additional capacity and lower-than-expected booking levels weigh on prices. In contrast, rates from Asia to the US, particularly the US West Coast, have remained relatively firm due to tighter supply caused by blank sailings and ongoing retailer inventory replenishments.

The scale of blanked sailings is contributing to a growing sense of uncertainty in booking reliability. With last-minute sailing cancellations and frequent schedule changes becoming increasingly common, an emerging trend has been to split bookings across multiple carriers to hedge against cancellations.

US-China Tariff Truce: A Temporary Respite
Amid this volatile environment, the recent US-China agreement to temporarily reduce tariffs for 90 days from May 14 offers some hope. The US has lowered tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China has eased tariffs on US imports from 125% to 10%.

The impact of the tariff pause has yet to fully filter through to shipping demand. However, many in the industry hope it could reignite volumes, especially in the transpacific trade, which has been hardest hit by tariff-driven disruptions and reduced consumer demand. The long-term benefits depend on whether this truce leads to a broader and more lasting trade agreement.

Looking Ahead: A Market in Flux
Even with the tariff reprieve, the global sea freight market faces lingering challenges. The combination of excessive vessel deliveries into a market of uncertain demand is expected to maintain downward pressure on rates in the months ahead. Ocean carriers are likely to continue balancing network adjustments, including further blank sailings and service restructures, to keep load factors at sustainable levels.

Some industry observers note that capacity cascading is already underway, with surplus vessels being redeployed to secondary trades such as Asia-Europe or intra-Asia, although these markets cannot fully absorb the overflow from the transpacific.

The situation remains fluid, with geopolitical risks, shifting consumer spending patterns, and global economic uncertainty all contributing to ongoing volatility. While the short-term outlook is mixed, we remain focused on managing risk and seeking stability in what continues to be a highly dynamic and unpredictable market.

The global sea freight market continues to adjust to shifting demand and capacity changes. With significant change underway, now is the ideal time to review your ocean freight strategy to ensure continuity and flexibility. EMAIL Andy Smith, Managing Director, to discuss how we can support your business with tailored solutions that keep your supply chain resilient and competitive.

India Pakistan map 1440x1080 1

India and Pakistan Impose Cargo Bans

May 13, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The fragile balance of South Asia’s supply chain network has been thrown into disarray after India and Pakistan imposed tit-for-tat bans on each other’s cargo.

The diplomatic standoff, triggered by recent violence in Kashmir and subsequent military exchanges, has sent shockwaves through ocean freight and air cargo networks, with the full extent of disruption still unfolding.

The restrictions have led to widespread delays and rerouting of vessels. India’s decision to prohibit ships carrying Pakistani cargo from docking at its ports has forced carriers to divert to transhipment hubs such as Colombo, creating congestion and adding time and cost.

Pakistan’s blanket ban on Indian goods in response has only compounded the uncertainty. Vessels already en route have been left scrambling for alternative discharge options, while planned schedules are being hastily redrawn.

Space shortages are emerging on regional sailings as shipping lines juggle altered rotations. Delays have rippled into feeder services and inland supply chains, resulting in longer transit times and missed delivery windows. Importers with urgent supply chain needs, such as fast fashion and electronics, face particular challenges as they attempt to secure scarce space at short notice.

The congestion has already pushed freight rates higher, with emergency surcharges now being levied on Pakistan-bound cargo by some carriers. We expect other shipping lines to follow suit as the cost of rerouting and delays continues to mount. Rates out of India, which had been steadily rising in the weeks prior to the crisis, are now expected to surge further.

The disruption has also spilled into the air cargo sector. Major airlines have started diverting flights to avoid Pakistan’s airspace, leading to longer flight times, higher fuel costs, and mounting pressure on capacity across Asia-Europe and Asia-US routes.

While two-way trade between India and Pakistan is relatively small, the standoff has had far wider implications. Third-country shipments caught between the two jurisdictions have been caught up in the diplomatic crossfire, with containers stranded or forced to take circuitous routes at significant extra cost.

With no immediate diplomatic solution in sight, supply chain stakeholders are preparing for ongoing uncertainty. Carriers are assessing whether to restructure service loops or add additional calls to alternative ports such as Jebel Ali to minimise customer disruption. However, the fallout comes on top of existing challenges, including ongoing Red Sea-related delays and persistent global port congestion.

The bans underline how geopolitical flashpoints can rapidly cascade into global supply chain instability. For cargo owners and logistics providers, the India-Pakistan crisis is a stark reminder of the need for flexible routing strategies and contingency planning in an era of growing geopolitical risk.

Geopolitical tensions and unexpected port bans can severely disrupt supply chains, as the India-Pakistan cargo restrictions have shown. In these uncertain times, it is critical for cargo owners to ensure that their marine insurance policies are robust and offer continuity of cover under all circumstances. We strongly advise all shippers to review the fine print and clauses of their insurance to avoid costly gaps in protection.

At Metro, we can help you safeguard your supply chain and navigate today’s complex global shipping environment with confidence. EMAIL Andy Smith, Managing Director, to discuss how we can support your business with risk management strategies, secure freight solutions, and expert guidance on marine insurance best practices.

COSCO appoint Metro partner

New US Port Fees Target Chinese and Non-Chinese Carriers

Apr 29, 2025 | , , , , , , ,

New US port fees aimed at Chinese-owned and Chinese-built ships are set to begin in October 2025, challenging China’s dominance in shipbuilding and shipping, while attempting to bolster the US maritime industry.

Under the new structure, Chinese ship owners and operators face charges starting at $120 per container when calling at US ports, with fees increasing annually to reach $250 per container by 2028. Vehicles carried on non-US built ships will incur a separate charge of $150 per vehicle. For container ships, the fee is based on the number of containers carried, rather than the ship’s tonnage.

Non-Chinese carriers operating Chinese-built ships will also be subject to container-based fees, at an initial $120 per container, rising to $153 in 2026 and up to $250 by 2028, aligning with the fee structure for Chinese carriers over time. This convergence means that while initial impacts differ, the long-term cost burden will become comparable.

Each affected vessel will be charged once per US port call, capped at a maximum of five charges per year. Ships arriving empty to collect bulk exports such as coal or grain are exempt.

Despite being less severe than the $1M+ per port call initially proposed, the financial burden remains significant. Analysts estimate that large Chinese container ships could face fees translating into approximately $300 to $600 per container, depending on ship size and cargo load. And for Chinese carriers the financial pressure will be three times higher than that faced by non-Chinese carriers initially.

Already, global trade patterns are shifting, with shipments originally bound for the US diverting to European ports. In the first quarter of 2025, Chinese imports into the UK rose by 15% and into the EU by 12%, contributing to congestion at key ports such as Felixstowe, Rotterdam, and Barcelona.

Carriers are now actively considering reshuffling service networks to minimise exposure to the new fees. Within the Ocean Alliance, partners such as CMA CGM and Evergreen Marine are expected to adjust operations, potentially taking on more US-bound services while Cosco and OOCL redeploy ships to European routes.

The long-term implications for container and vehicle supply chains are profound. Higher operating costs are likely to filter down to consumers, particularly in the US, while European and UK ports could face continued strain from increased cargo volumes. The situation is fluid, and further adjustments by carriers and shippers are expected as the October deadline approaches.

We’re working closely with clients as we monitor regulatory developments, ready to react and adapt container shipping strategies in real time. If your supply chain depends on US port access, now is the time to assess your exposure and prepare contingencies.

EMAIL our Managing Director, Andrew Smith, to learn how we can protect your network, manage cost risks, and keep you competitive — no matter how the tide turns.

Hidden threat to exporters

Northern Europe’s Ports Struggle with Congestion Amid Network Shifts

Apr 29, 2025 | , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ports across Northern Europe are grappling with rising congestion, causing widespread delays and operational disruption. A confluence of industrial action, infrastructure strain, inland transport bottlenecks and the rollout of new shipping alliances is overwhelming terminals, with no immediate relief in sight.

Container volumes have surged at key gateways such as Antwerp-Bruges, Bremerhaven, Rotterdam, and Felixstowe, with waiting times and yard occupancy levels climbing.

Antwerp is experiencing yard utilisation at 96%, with reefer plugs over capacity at 112%.

Nearly half the vessels arriving are waiting for berths, and 52 more containerships are en route. Berthing delays are being exacerbated by residual backlogs following strikes at the end of March, and the port has reduced its export delivery window to five days to help ease pressure.

In Germany, Bremerhaven is seeing similar strain, with nearly 30% of vessels waiting for berths and inland rail disruptions further complicating the situation. Landslides and line closures near Hannover forced lengthy rail detours, impacting traffic to and from major ports including Hamburg, Rotterdam and Duisburg. These rail delays are causing a cascading effect across Northern Europe’s inland logistics.

The Netherlands is also under pressure, with unresolved automation disputes in Rotterdam contributing to labour-related delays. In France, strikes at Le Havre have eased for now during ongoing negotiations, but the risk of renewed action remains high.

The UK is not immune. Felixstowe, London Gateway, and Southampton are all dealing with congestion as vessel diversions from continental ports push volumes higher.

Multiple factors are compounding the problem. The phasing in and out of new alliance schedules—particularly by Maersk, MSC, and Hapag-Lloyd—is disrupting established flows and increasing port calls. Simultaneously, low water levels on the Rhine are limiting barge capacity, shifting more freight to already stretched rail and road networks. Labour shortages, especially during public holidays, have further constrained operations.

With delays mounting, carriers are urging shippers to collect containers promptly and to avoid early delivery of exports. Some terminals, like PSA Antwerp, have shortened delivery windows to reduce yard congestion. Carriers are implementing contingency plans on a vessel-by-vessel basis and may introduce congestion surcharges to offset rising operational costs.

Industry forecasts suggest that congestion could persist for another three to four months, until alliance network changes bed in and volumes normalise. In the meantime, importers and exporters should prepare for longer lead times, increased costs, and fluctuating capacity at Europe’s busiest container ports.

With congestion disrupting major European gateways, our flexible contingency plans are keeping cargo moving, rerouting through alternative ports and opening up new entry points.

To reduce delays and protect your supply chain, share your shipping forecasts early so we can act fast and proactively manage risks.

For expert advice and tailored solutions, EMAIL Andrew Smith, Managing Director, today.

Category: 4PL

4PL | Air | China | eCommerce | EU | Foodstuffs | Hong Kong | International Trade | News | Publishing | Retail | Supply Chain

Latest News in this category